Cheapest ≠ Easiest Mathematics may be the "cheapest" in terms of resources, but intellectually it is among the most demanding. In fact, even more demanding than Physics or Chemistry, in my opinion. Its abstractions require precision and deep concentration. At its core, it's a product of abstract reasoning and pure logic. Unlike physics or chemistry, it doesn’t require laboratories, telescopes, particle accelerators, or chemical reagents. At the same time, Mathematics is the language of Physics and Chemistry. To truly grasp and appreciate the elegance of natural laws, whether in motion, forces, or atoms , one must first understand mathematical principles like Vectors, Calculus, Differential Equations, Probability. It ranges from very abstract concepts like Category Theory, Algebraic Geometry and Number theory to very practical concepts like Probability, Statistics and Game Theory which has tremendous applications in all branches of sciences and in our daily life. Throughout history, many great mathematical discoveries were made with nothing more than pen and paper , or even pure thought. Ramanujan, for instance, worked out brilliant results on slate boards and from memory alone. In that sense, mathematics is remarkably accessible: with the simplest of tools, anyone can engage with the same concepts that occupy the greatest mathematicians. It may be the cheapest science to practice, but it is also one of the toughest to master. In fact, it is so central and challenging that even within physics, there exists an entire discipline devoted to it: Mathematical physics.
When I do maths inside social science in my comments, people start crying :( For example, when Islamic invasion happened, roughly 3% of Hindu population was fighting against 16% of Islamic invaders’ population. That’s how you can detect that it’s a caste system issue—the reason why Hindu kings lost. Typically, It took 100-200 years for a particular generation of Islamic invaders to grow to the equivalent population of the Hindu kingdom. This means the Islamic Kings who promised people prosperity after the invasion weren't the one who actually provided it, it was 2–3 generations afterward by some descendant. When movies are made, we over-glorify or over-vilify and forget that it’s mostly situations, not necessarily an individual’s bravery or cruelty responsible for the victory. Just taking some creative liberty to oversimplify but pattern is almost universal. See, How useful maths is even at the places where you expect the least 😅
Yash PratapAgree. One of the prime reasons being we don't have a natural intuition towards thinking in numbers, we are more intuitive towards stories than statistics numbers.
Debdeep SenguptaJos Gommans did some analysis, he is modern dutch historian who did some maths in Mughal Warfare. You need expertise in population studies and sociology to make sense of my words, I don't think Indians knows the history & politics of India mostly because they're bugged by the ideologies, the best way to know things is by going in the history of technology. In India, we don't teach the truth in India because our political interests doesn't align with the truth or rationality but it aligns with the agenda of Hindu Rashtra Utopia. I don't want to talk more about this ..
Debdeep SenguptaI will not explain you if some decent person ask I'll explain.. I don't like to talk to people who are indulged into hatred I saw your profile and comments and you're a narcissist .hashtag#narcissistspotted
Yash PratapOne needs to look at the absolute numbers of two groups too, just percentage is not helpful. As you mentioned yourself, "it took 100-200 years for Islamic invaders to grow to the equivalent population of the Hindu Kingdom". By saying this, you have contradicted yourself, if Hindus were more in numbers, even a smaller % may mean there were more Hindu soldiers against Islamic invaders. I have seen people use statistics without thinking mindfully. Just a few days back, I found somewhere someone had mentioned that they have publications with a cumulative impact factor of more than 100. What does it mean 🤭? Mean of impact factor would have been a meaningful number (dividing the cumulative with number of publications). But what does this cumulative impact factor say? Nothing. They claim to have excellent scientific credentials. But at least it's not true with their statistical knowledge.
Prateek KumarThe mathematics ain't the science. It's a template or fictional architecture but conflate with the reality anyway. It looks like an interface between the mind/body (as a wholeness) and reality. Almost, every human being own that interface. However, the Westerners have a linear history comprehending, while the Easterners have the cyclical history understanding. Therefore, the Easterners like you, proclaim that as the science. Please read my essay and/or my dissertation.
Hassan OzdemirWhatever it may be, the main point is that it is as useful to science as language is for communication. That's why I wrote it's the language of science.
Prateek KumarI have objected that "It may be the cheapest science to practice," only. But you claim now other one of argument as your answer and that makes sense but even it may able to discuss from potential paradigm in future. "Leibniz and Clarke explored various philosophical questions arising out of Newton’s new mechanics, for example: what is the difference between merely apparent (‘relative’) motion and true (‘absolute’) motion? How can we possibly determine ‘global’ properties of the Universe, such as its overall velocity? And how to understand identity in physics – could there, for example, be two physical bodies alike in all respects? ... In the 19th century, a mathematical revolution was precipitated by János Bolyai (1802-60) and Nikolai Lobachevsky (1792-1856), who showed that there could be consistent non-Euclidean geometries (that is, alternatives to Euclid’s geometry as presented in his Elements) in which, say, the sum of interior angles of a triangle is either more or less than 180 degrees. ...(as Kant had it), the structure of space must be Euclidean, or are there in fact other possibilities for the geometry of space? https://aeon.co/essays/what-does-the-philosophy-of-physics-add-to-human-knowledge
Let me say that you are completely mistaken and probably didn't think the matter through. Mathematics took an entire universe to be born and a very special planet to be exercised by making an intelligent life form capable of creativity, abstraction and logic. Furthermore, Physics and chemistry are the mathematical formulations of natural laws; it is still mathematics but an applied one aka "Science". What humans use as auxiliaries to do science was already available at the onset of the universe, so it shouldn't be counted twice.
All said and done...can science survive without mathematics? If yes is the answer then it is a fictional story ...if the answer is no then how to call mathematics...science...mother of science ..or just a template?
2 replies
2 Replies on Dr. Narasimhan Sampathkumar’s comment
The cognitive load required to work with measure theory, formal probability theory, abstraction of set theory and logic, combinatorics etc. is equivalent to juggling a ball, playing piano, putting on socks while skipping rope, all at the same time.
There are three realities. First, the absolute actual reality that no one knows, the second that we all have in our brain/mind based on the "sample" of the original actual reality we have explored so far, and third is the one that Mathematics can represnt. It turns out the third reality is far bigger than the first two. The reality represented by Math is so Universal it goes beyond human civilization. Consider this - the concept of prime numbers or Pi or Calculus are so Universal that Every intelligent civilization throughout the entire Universe in their journey would discover (or inventiont, I wonder?) The same concepts by other names. That is how Universal Math is. I wish we all had great Math teachers so we all could appreciate the beauty and consistency of Mathematics. It is the mother of all Sciences. One of my favourite books "God must be a Mathematecian". Galileo pointed out "Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the Universe".
Shailesh KumarMath is the language we interpret the world in. it's probably the least ambiguous language ( but still is ). And like we don't know if the same laws of gravity work in the broader universe, we can't be sure that Pi and Calculus that we know will be any useful in other parts of the universe.
Shailesh KumarSir, brilliant summation of universal conciousness, energy or reality. In my sequencing, i would like to put the unknown reality as the biggest, followed by the mathematical reality (since maths is the creation of human mind and conciousness) and third is the part which rests in our brains (depending on the individual capacity). My apologies to interject here 🙏🙏🙏
Shailesh Kumarare you separating mathematics and reality? Maybe the reality is neither real nor unreal, how about that? To me, the "reality" may be intrepreted in various ways, we may use mathematics or associated abstractions to describe or manipulate the way the we want view "reality" perhaps.....
Dr. T.R.Sreeram .I am just pointing out that Mathematics in it's current t form (more is needed) is also pretty good at "representing" reality. It is not reality itself. Like our languages are not reality or our AI models are not reality. They are just representations of reality.
In addition to precision and deep concentration, mathematics' abstractions also require imagination (paraphrased from a famous statement by David Hilbert). That mathematics (like music) is remarkably accessible explains why those two fields generate the most prodigies. “Die Mathematik ist die Königin der Wissenschaften und die Zahlentheorie ist die Königin der Mathematik “ ("Mathematics is the queen of the sciences and number theory is the queen of mathematics.") Carl Friedrich Gauss
Mathematics IS NOT A Science. In fact modern mathematics got developed because of science to fulfill the needs of science. Calculus what is the first modern version to enable Isaac Newton to do computations which is laws of motion which are science. Merely a collection of tools which can be highly sophisticated yes but still a set of tools, can't do any science work until being put into the right use. The problem is mathematicians think they're scientists and can indulge in any science. Statistics is an offshoot branch of mathematics which is closer to science ➡️it connects the measurements of reality finding about which is the real task of science. It talks about errors and probabilities of occurrences not exact mathematical solutions. But there is no point debating over this Today the caricature of science is gone deeper Now you havehashtag#Data#.Science with not the slightest scientific methodology or temperament being used by any of the proclaimed Practitioners. Logic, some have tried to point out is science, but is part of mathematics again the same blunder. Remember Boolean algebra? It's a pity even top rank people do not know the meaning of science in 2025.
Manab ChakrabortyUniversities include mathematics within their "Division of Science". If you want to go back even further than "modern mathematics", mathematics was integral to the study of astronomy (a science?) and other applications of trigonometry and geometry. Before that it has its origins in Babylon and ancient Egypt for land management (and pyramids) and accounting. If you don't want to classify mathematics as a science then where would you put it? Philosophy? (Prior to modern mathematics philosophy encompassed just about everything - haha!!). And what is science?
Andrew LentonI have experienced that sciences are not as much scientific as they boast and not as much scientific as Mathematics is. However, to me mathematics is more like the art of science.
Outside of pen and paper, math also requires two more things: brains and patience. Higher level math starts inventing on the learned material: like non-euclidian geometry, of curved spaces. Then string theory. I watch one profs math video and can't get past the first two minutes 😅
Mathematics may be called the cheapest science, but that doesn’t mean it’s easily accessible to everyone. It demands focus, patience, and the right mindset to truly understand and appreciate it.
Well, than maybe it is not considered a science. In science we need experiments and for performing experiments we need equipments. And it happens that the more expensive ones help in performing more precised experiments. I would say that the same things such as a pen and a paper are necessary in art, literature, philosophy.
Though it offends others, but I personally and very strongly believe that “Maths is the only science” , rest are meta sciences. It is the language of God in which the universe and every existence has been written.
Can mathematics cure diseases or can produce electricity.Normally Physics is mother science and maths is her brother.people may disagree due to their ownbackground.Nounique answer exists.
Great post, but I would not necessarily claim any field is the “hardest”. Many fields grow increasingly difficult with advancement. Accessibility is what you’re emphasizing. That said, advanced mathematics is one of the most simultaneously rewarding fields to progress in AND difficult (for ME), largely due to its diverse sub fields. Knot theory isn’t probability, and probability isn’t partial differential equations.
Who needs paper? Archimedes proved sand is sufficient. Hamilton proved a bridge is sufficient. My teachers proved chalk is sufficient. And now in the digital age ...
Even the most expensive things science has ever built: CERN’s LHC or NASA Web telescope each about 10 billion dollar, the main cost is the main power! Compared to other things like the planned 3 new Harlem tunnels in New York City for 15 billion or a Ford class carrier 13 billion with the aircrafts the science projects are a bargain!
You said light is a wave, and that's what pushed you towards the claim that the universe is expanding. You who say that light is independent from the source, how do you accept the cause of redshift? As far as you're concerned, once light leaves a galaxy, whether the galaxy stays there or moves, both are the same. Light that has disconnected from the galaxy. How can it express the state happening in the galaxy? If Ole Roemer's experiment is true, it confirms that even though light takes time to travel, we see real-time events. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JfuWzkfEs/
Mathematics is necessary when a measurable concept doesn’t exist within the spoken language. Just inventing a new word doesn’t explain the concept. Defining a way to measure properties of the concept and how to analyze these measurements gives others an opportunity to discover the concept that cannot yet be expressed. Once enough people have acquired the concept, then a meaningful word can develop.
necessity is the mother of invention... We want to solve critical problems in a simpler and theoretical way so we make mathematics... Like newton made calculus to solve the gravity and planetary motion... Am i right???
Numbers never lie and paper n pen gives us more clear mindset and works differently pure result no ifs n buts actions produces cashflow all business working day and night for cashflow with value
Had we recognised Mathematics as a tool (or language to communicate)to solve/explain/optimise scientific phenomena, may be lesser students would’ve hated mathematics. Assisining it as a different branch of study alienates the fundamental logic intended to flow out as a natural by product.
Nonphysical math must have existed before the physical physics because the physical physics is dependent on the nonphysical math, but nonphysical math does not require the physical. Of course both existed before being discovered.
Beasts arguing about nonsense. Vulgarity is not beneath contempt. What a poor example of ideology. Born by inbred malicious contemptuous vulgar buffoons. Pardon the use of animals as comparison. For we are have little respect of them.
Yes, mathematics is the cheapest science or, should I say "mother of all science & technologies", it widens your thinking & problem-solving ability like nothing else, elevates your innovation and last but definitely not the least, it helps build connection with the universe itself. YES, WITH THE UNIVERSE, AS AN ENGINEER, IT FEEDS ON YOUR CAPACITY TO RETHINK AND EXECUTE LIKE YOU'RE ANY ASTROLOGIST. Thanks for reminiscing this beautiful gem.
Are we so great that we would rather suffer. We are not great we are a pityful species that is selfish. We do not care for our own suffering. Our greatness will be awfulised by self respected cultures. We are the universes bad example.
Math is all in your head, unless you run a well structured simulation, even if 1000 best mathematicians agree with you it does not mean it is true or correct. My hope is once ASI can analyze math and physics stack it will rewrite it without human error and we will get scientific discoveries which were hidden by current state of the science. The current stack in an ugly monster build on endless assumptions and simplifications.
Faïçal BARZIyou seem confused. You are saying that mathematics existed before the universe began (and hence is fundamental) but that it required the creation of intelligence to invent it (and hence is derivative). Is it invented or discovered?
Honorable:- Subject:- Help for the purpose of making a new satellite Date:-05-03-2023 Sir, My request is that I am a boy from a simple family. Sir, my educational qualification is 12th pass, I am 19 years old. Sir, I want to make a new satellite. Sir, that satellite will be able to take good pictures of any distant planet or star. Sir, this satellite will work better than NASA's James Webb Space Satellite. Sir, the satellite that I am talking about making is not available to any country at present. Sir, this satellite will help to know the entire universe. Sir, this satellite will run aircraft using water power and solar power. This satellite will help to make rain in desert areas. Sir, this satellite will charge the solar system for 24 hours. Sir, many things can be made using this satellite which will help to develop the human world on earth. Sir please help me to make it sir I am a hardworking family boy. Sir to know more about it my phone number is 9907325052 or my email id is mithunbabu069@gmail.comSir please help me sir. NAME MITHUN MANDAL C/O-SADAGAR MANDAL VILL-KEDAR TOLA P.O-NAOBARAR JAIGIR P.S-BHUTNI, DIST-MALDA STATE-WEST BENGAL PIN NO-732203 MOBILE NO-9907325052 Sir waiting for your pot
Michael Weisserdiscovered as in the principles were always there and someone realized it, created as in the proofs had to be written down and the explanations human-derived.
Mathematics would benefit greatly from more funding for doctoral students and postdocs. We need well fed and focussed minds working together to produce results.
Galileo Galilei, often called the “father of modern science,” was a man who changed the way humanity looks at the universe. Born in Pisa in 1564, he first studied medicine but soon discovered his passion for mathematics and natural philosophy. His curiosity led him to experiment with motion, showing that objects fall at the same rate regardless of weight, a claim that challenged centuries of Aristotelian belief. Galileo’s most famous contributions came through his use of the telescope, a relatively new invention that he refined to unprecedented power. With it, he observed the rugged surface of the Moon, countless stars invisible to the naked eye, and the moons of Jupiter circling their planet. These discoveries provided strong evidence for the Copernican idea that the Earth is not the center of the cosmos, but rather orbits the Sun. His ideas clashed with the Catholic Church, leading to a trial and his forced recantation. Yet even under house arrest, Galileo continued to write and think, leaving behind works that inspired generations. His life embodies the tension between tradition and discovery, reminding us that the pursuit of truth often requires courage as well as brilliance. Explore math with us:
Some comments may not be displayed in the Most relevant view. To see these comments, select Most recent.
Yash Pratap
• You
For example, when Islamic invasion happened, roughly 3% of Hindu population was fighting against 16% of Islamic invaders’ population. That’s how you can detect that it’s a caste system issue—the reason why Hindu kings lost.
Typically, It took 100-200 years for a particular generation of Islamic invaders to grow to the equivalent population of the Hindu kingdom. This means the Islamic Kings who promised people prosperity after the invasion weren't the one who actually provided it, it was 2–3 generations afterward by some descendant.
When movies are made, we over-glorify or over-vilify and forget that it’s mostly situations, not necessarily an individual’s bravery or cruelty responsible for the victory.
Just taking some creative liberty to oversimplify but pattern is almost universal.
See, How useful maths is even at the places where you expect the least 😅
Prateek Kumar Author
Anirwan Sengupta, PMP®
• 1st
Yash Pratap
• You
In India, we don't teach the truth in India because our political interests doesn't align with the truth or rationality but it aligns with the agenda of Hindu Rashtra Utopia.
I don't want to talk more about this ..
Yash Pratap
• You
Om Yeole
• 3rd+
Yash Pratap
• You
Jitu Sharma
• 2nd
Yash Pratap
• You
Bharath Hebbe Madhusudhana
• 3rd+
Hassan Ozdemir • 2nd
However, the Westerners have a linear history comprehending, while the Easterners have the cyclical history understanding. Therefore, the Easterners like you, proclaim that as the science.
Please read my essay and/or my dissertation.
Prateek Kumar Author
That's why I wrote it's the language of science.
Jitu Sharma
• 2nd
Hassan Ozdemir • 2nd
"Leibniz and Clarke explored various philosophical questions arising out of Newton’s new mechanics, for example: what is the difference between merely apparent (‘relative’) motion and true (‘absolute’) motion? How can we possibly determine ‘global’ properties of the Universe, such as its overall velocity? And how to understand identity in physics – could there, for example, be two physical bodies alike in all respects? ...
In the 19th century, a mathematical revolution was precipitated by János Bolyai (1802-60) and Nikolai Lobachevsky (1792-1856), who showed that there could be consistent non-Euclidean geometries (that is, alternatives to Euclid’s geometry as presented in his Elements) in which, say, the sum of interior angles of a triangle is either more or less than 180 degrees.
...(as Kant had it), the structure of space must be Euclidean, or are there in fact other possibilities for the geometry of space?
https://aeon.co/essays/what-does-the-philosophy-of-physics-add-to-human-knowledge
What does the philosophy of physics add to human knowledge? | Aeon Essays
Some physicists reject philosophy as a distraction from ‘real’ science but it is in fact both useful and beautiful
Anurag Banerjee
• 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Anurag Banerjee
• 3rd+
Elyes ASMI • 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Faïçal BARZI • 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Anas Shabbir Ahmed Ansari
• 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Tanay Gupta
• 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Dr. Narasimhan Sampathkumar • 2nd
Prateek Kumar Author
Dr. Narasimhan Sampathkumar • 2nd
Kumar Kaustubh
• 2nd
Prateek Kumar Author
Sardar Dilbag Singh Khalsa
• 2nd
Prateek Kumar Author
Shailesh Kumar • 2nd
I wish we all had great Math teachers so we all could appreciate the beauty and consistency of Mathematics. It is the mother of all Sciences.
One of my favourite books "God must be a Mathematecian". Galileo pointed out "Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the Universe".
Rajneesh K. • 2nd
Vijaybahu Joshi
• 2nd
Dr. T.R.Sreeram . • 3rd+
Shailesh Kumar • 2nd
Ashish Misra
• 3rd+
G. Jack Theurer
• 3rd+
That mathematics (like music) is remarkably accessible explains why those two fields generate the most prodigies.
“Die Mathematik ist die Königin der Wissenschaften und die Zahlentheorie ist die Königin der Mathematik “
("Mathematics is the queen of the sciences and number theory is the queen of mathematics.")
Carl Friedrich Gauss
Prateek Kumar Author
Manab Chakraborty • 2nd
Merely a collection of tools which can be highly sophisticated yes but still a set of tools, can't do any science work until being put into the right use.
The problem is mathematicians think they're scientists and can indulge in any science.
Statistics is an offshoot branch of mathematics which is closer to science ➡️it connects the measurements of reality finding about which is the real task of science. It talks about errors and probabilities of occurrences not exact mathematical solutions.
But there is no point debating over this
Today the caricature of science is gone deeper
Now you have hashtag#Data #.Science with not the slightest scientific methodology or temperament being used by any of the proclaimed Practitioners.
Logic, some have tried to point out is science, but is part of mathematics again the same blunder. Remember Boolean algebra?
It's a pity even top rank people do not know the meaning of science in 2025.
G. Jack Theurer
• 3rd+
If you want to go back even further than "modern mathematics", mathematics was integral to the study of astronomy (a science?) and other applications of trigonometry and geometry.
Before that it has its origins in Babylon and ancient Egypt for land management (and pyramids) and accounting.
If you don't want to classify mathematics as a science then where would you put it? Philosophy? (Prior to modern mathematics philosophy encompassed just about everything - haha!!).
And what is science?
Andrew Lenton • 3rd+
Prateek Kumar Author
Jitu Sharma
• 2nd
Andrew Lenton • 3rd+
Faïçal BARZI • 3rd+
Andrew Lenton • 3rd+
But basically you appear to be a Platonist.
Faïçal BARZI • 3rd+
Andrew Lenton • 3rd+
Moumita Dey • 2nd
Trishan Bera
• 3rd+
Subha B. Basu, PhD/MBA
• 3rd+
Higher level math starts inventing on the learned material: like non-euclidian geometry, of curved spaces. Then string theory. I watch one profs math video and can't get past the first two minutes 😅
Shivani Vishvkarma • 2nd
Enida Nushi
• 3rd+
Hassan ZAYTOUN
• 3rd+
Rishabh Shukla
• 2nd
Ravi Shankar • 2nd
Vishal Acharya,PhD • 3rd+
2*2 = 4 not 5 unlike p-value exist 🥹
Ram Tandon • 2nd
THOMAS SHONEY KAPPIL PUTHUSSERI
• 3rd+
Sattwik Jana • 3rd+
Sanjeev Singh
• 3rd+
Muddassara Kanwal • 3rd+
Joshua Carmichael
• 3rd+
That said, advanced mathematics is one of the most simultaneously rewarding fields to progress in AND difficult (for ME), largely due to its diverse sub fields. Knot theory isn’t probability, and probability isn’t partial differential equations.
Biswatosh Purkayastha
• 3rd+
Pradeep Nagar
• 2nd
Ted Shaneyfelt
• 3rd+
Archimedes proved sand is sufficient.
Hamilton proved a bridge is sufficient.
My teachers proved chalk is sufficient.
And now in the digital age ...
Malikireddy Krishnareddy
• 3rd+
Karthik R
• 2nd
Uday Biswas
• 2nd
Karthik R
• 2nd
Nickolas Solomey
• 3rd+
Jitu Sharma
• 2nd
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Scott Williams
• 3rd+
Jalal Deen • 3rd+
You who say that light is independent from the source, how do you accept the cause of redshift? As far as you're concerned, once light leaves a galaxy, whether the galaxy stays there or moves, both are the same. Light that has disconnected from the galaxy. How can it express the state happening in the galaxy?
If Ole Roemer's experiment is true, it confirms that even though light takes time to travel, we see real-time events.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JfuWzkfEs/
Jalal Deen
You said light is a wave, and that's what pushed you towards the claim that the universe is expanding. If Ole Roemer's experiment is true, it confirms that even though light takes time to travel, we...
Ken Mellendorf
• 3rd+
Srinjoy Pramanik
• 3rd+
Indranarain Ramlall • 3rd+
Uday Biswas
• 2nd
We want to solve critical problems in a simpler and theoretical way so we make mathematics...
Like newton made calculus to solve the gravity and planetary motion...
Am i right???
Matin Kagadi
• 2nd
Jayaprakash Gupta • 3rd+
Prashant Gade • 3rd+
Venu Gopal B • 3rd+
Lt Col Arunsekhar Chandrasekharan PhD, FIE, C.Eng
• 2nd
Jyoti Patel
• 2nd
John Hixon
• 2nd
Arvind Sinha, F.N.A.Sc, F.I.C.S
• 2nd
Sayak Chakraborty • 3rd+
Ted Shaneyfelt
• 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Maitree Debnath • 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Chandrasekhar MV • 3rd+
Tushar Kumar • 3rd+
Andriy K. • 3rd+
Bharati Yadav
• 3rd+
Ted Shaneyfelt
• 3rd+
Hassan ZAYTOUN
• 3rd+
Manu Sivadas • 3rd+
Hassan ZAYTOUN
• 3rd+
Aniket Ganguly
• 3rd+
Andrew Lenton • 3rd+
Is it invented or discovered?
Aniket Joshi • 3rd+
Muhammad Aslam • 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Tarun Jain
• 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Soumaya IDRISS • 3rd+
Vaibhav Mukund Balkawade
• 3rd+
Mithun Mandal • 3rd+
Subject:- Help for the purpose of making a new satellite
Date:-05-03-2023
Sir,
My request is that I am a boy from a simple family. Sir, my educational qualification is 12th pass, I am 19 years old. Sir, I want to make a new satellite. Sir, that satellite will be able to take good pictures of any distant planet or star. Sir, this satellite will work better than NASA's James Webb Space Satellite. Sir, the satellite that I am talking about making is not available to any country at present. Sir, this satellite will help to know the entire universe. Sir, this satellite will run aircraft using water power and solar power. This satellite will help to make rain in desert areas. Sir, this satellite will charge the solar system for 24 hours.
Sir, many things can be made using this satellite which will help to develop the human world on earth.
Sir please help me to make it sir I am a hardworking family boy. Sir to know more about it my phone number is 9907325052 or my email id is
mithunbabu069@gmail.com Sir please help me sir.
NAME MITHUN MANDAL
C/O-SADAGAR MANDAL
VILL-KEDAR TOLA
P.O-NAOBARAR JAIGIR
P.S-BHUTNI,
DIST-MALDA
STATE-WEST BENGAL
PIN NO-732203
MOBILE NO-9907325052
Sir waiting for your pot
G Donald Allen
• 3rd+
Dr. William Middlebrooks, D.Div., CIC, AIC
• 3rd+
Michael Weisser • 3rd+
Luiz Bravim, MBA
• 3rd+
Manjunath Bhairappanavar • 3rd+
Happy Engineers day
!
Finest 1 post on LinkedIn after long..long time.....
Thank god!
Thanks for sharing
ayhan yuzubenli • 3rd+
A A • 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Christina Sormani
• 3rd+
Abou Baker Essadiq REDJIL
• 3rd+
Azamat Abdoullaev • 2nd
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Juha Ylinen
• 3rd+
Arul Gunasekaran
• 3rd+
Pamela Hauff
• 3rd+
Balungi F. • 2nd
Galileo’s most famous contributions came through his use of the telescope, a relatively new invention that he refined to unprecedented power. With it, he observed the rugged surface of the Moon, countless stars invisible to the naked eye, and the moons of Jupiter circling their planet. These discoveries provided strong evidence for the Copernican idea that the Earth is not the center of the cosmos, but rather orbits the Sun.
His ideas clashed with the Catholic Church, leading to a trial and his forced recantation. Yet even under house arrest, Galileo continued to write and think, leaving behind works that inspired generations. His life embodies the tension between tradition and discovery, reminding us that the pursuit of truth often requires courage as well as brilliance.
Explore math with us: